Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Deb

I’m sorry, but it was billed as a Lincoln-Douglas type of debate. I’m just saying that Newt isn’t the master debater as the Newtbots bill him. He is, but with the middle two syllables deleted.

And, I’m really getting sick of his commercials trashing Romney for (G-d forfend) making a profit.


57 posted on 01/13/2012 3:42:35 PM PST by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Daveinyork

I agree absolutely. Newt needs to shut his face about Romney’s business history. Santorum comes out of this looking like the hero he is.


58 posted on 01/13/2012 3:45:37 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork
Romney didn't just make a profit. Romney is a vulture capitalist.The U.S. Cannot Have A Private Equity President, Mitt Romney

First, is just one tale of a Bain deal under Romney. Bain invested just $30 million to take over a company. It then arranged for this company to pay Bain and its investors a special dividend of $180 million– or six times the amount of equity capital Bain invested to take control. This technique of forcing your prey to pay back your original investment or more, as in this case, is to ensure that the Private Equity Firm is assured of a profit. It is an exploitative way to strip the company of its spare cash and is indefensible corporate rape. It is one selfish and destructive way to play the Private Equity game. For the average holding period by a PE firm is somewhere between 3 and 5 years– in and out with little thought as to the long term performance of the company or the protection of its employees.

Special report: Romney's steel skeleton in the Bain closet

a federal government insurance agency had to pony up $44 million to bail out the company's underfunded pension plan. Nevertheless, Bain profited on the deal, receiving $12 million on its $8 million initial investment and at least $4.5 million in consulting fees.

His supporters say the pension gap at the Kansas City mill was an unforeseen consequence of a falling stock market and adverse market conditions. But records show that the mill's Bain-backed management was confronted several times about the fund's shortfall, which, in the end, required an infusion of funds from the federal Pension Benefits Guarantee Corp.

63 posted on 01/13/2012 3:55:34 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork
Correct link for first excerpt.

The U.S. Cannot Have A Private Equity President, Mitt Romney - Forbes

First, is just one tale of a Bain deal under Romney. Bain invested just $30 million to take over a company. It then arranged for this company to pay Bain and its investors a special dividend of $180 million– or six times the amount of equity capital Bain invested to take control. This technique of forcing your prey to pay back your original investment or more, as in this case, is to ensure that the Private Equity Firm is assured of a profit. It is an exploitative way to strip the company of its spare cash and is indefensible corporate rape. It is one selfish and destructive way to play the Private Equity game. For the average holding period by a PE firm is somewhere between 3 and 5 years– in and out with little thought as to the long term performance of the company or the protection of its employees.

64 posted on 01/13/2012 3:58:33 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson