Wrong.
Everything you just repeated was refuted in earlier posts.
Wrong again.
1)Thomas’ opinion was on the losing side.
Was his opinion correct? (As I asked and you failed to answer: Don't tell me you think the Constitution says whatever the Supreme Court says that it says? Do you think that about, say, Roe v Wade or Lawrence v Texas?)
2) Thomas’ rationale affirms the Commerce clause in general, while disputing only a specific and small exception as described by Thomas.
The exception is "local cultivation and consumption of marijuana;" nothing in the opinion supports your claim that it's "small."
Incorrect on all points...and more repeating of wrong stuff.
Ron Paul must be heard.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EQSOwgWG1c&feature=related