To: mnehring
At least Paul has the ability to recognize failure and continues aiming for smaller government. If anything he should be commended for sticking to his guns. In case you haven't noticed, he is not a one man show. You, not so much. You seem disappointed that people who truly want smaller government are increasing in number. Why is that? Do you want smaller government, or a big government that grows more slowly? Which of the two ideas is more conservative?
To: Fester Chugabrew; mnehring
Paul has the ability to recognize failure That is hysterically funny, if Paul actually recognized failure he would have stopped running for President two decades ago.
104 posted on
01/02/2012 2:58:45 PM PST by
svcw
(For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
To: Fester Chugabrew; mnehring
You seem disappointed that people who truly want smaller government are increasing in number. You seem to be smacking some strawmen around nicely. Serious question: If a person with Ron Paul's (supposed) position on smaller government came out to the podium at one of the debates in a Batman costume and insisted the moderator address him as "The Dark Knight" or "Mr. Wayne," would you vote for him?
No, right?
Well, when Ron Paul comes out and acts like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a sane and logical person who can be deterred by MAD policy like some Politburo official drinking vodka in his dacha on the weekend, that's as crazy to me as coming out to the podium in a Batman suit. Now, if you want to call that reaction a fear of smaller government, feel free, but you're just making more crazy to go with your candidate's crazy if you do.
132 posted on
01/02/2012 7:26:53 PM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(Ron Paul is to the Constitution as Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson