BTW, I also want to point out that there’s every possibility that Gingrich is NOT for universal coverage, even though his website says he is FOR universal coverage.
I think that because what he actually posted as the summary of his healthcare reform plan really doesn’t make sense, or at the least is missing key facts, as it stands now.
And, of course, there are lots of definitions of universal coverage, some of them quite complex. So maybe Gingrich has in mind some highly technical definition of universal coverage that isn’t synonymous with or a code word for socialized medicine or just a term the Left uses one way and the Right uses another. (How confusing.)
Maybe Gingrich just didn’t choose his words carefully enough and he never meant to state or imply that the goal of his plan was universal coverage. Or that he meant some kind of universal coverage that is different from that other universal coverage? Maybe he’ll walk it back or get a new editor?
“BTW, I also want to point out that there’s every possibility that Gingrich is NOT for universal coverage”
That would be a great bet, since he’s not for it.
“even though his website says he is FOR universal coverage.”
No it doesn’t. You are making assumptions that don’t meet the standard of reasonableness.