[wideminded]

just think of what happened after 9/11. Immediately, before there was any assessment, there was glee in the administration because now we can invade Iraq.

Maybe not glee, but definitely a sense of not letting a good crisis go to waste. And there were definitely people who wanted to invade Iraq before 9/11 and viewed this as their big chance. So Paul is basically right. And saying this doesn't make him a "truther".

[rbmillerjr]

9-11 Sept 2001

Afghanistan Oct 2001

Iraq March 2003

Two of these make sense together, one doesn’t.

“So Paul is basically right.”

No, he is basically incorrect.

“And saying this doesn’t make him a “truther”.”

It makes him a conspiratorial nutcake and at the very least, a Truther Lite. Probably more, since he hangs with Alex’s Truther Calvacade.

[Mtner77]

Maybe not glee, but definitely a sense of not letting a good crisis go to waste. And there were definitely people who wanted to invade Iraq before 9/11 and viewed this as their big chance. So Paul is basically right. And saying this doesn’t make him a “truther”.

__________________________________

Is it just me, or do I feel another Paulbot ZOT coming? JimRob? Still there??