Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yulee; gogogodzilla

Wonderful history lesson, Yulee, thank you. The more one learns, the more complicated it is. However, Jerusalem itself is the main point of contention: the perpetual tug-of-war among Jew, Christian and Muslim.

For Newt to put this complicated situation into a simple sound-bite does not do justice to all concerned, including Israeli Jews.

I wonder how many FReepers and evangelicals realize that Israel is prepared to accede to a two-state solution. The problem is the Palis refuse to negotiate because they want all of Jerusalem. They had their day, though, when the Ottoman Empire ruled Jerusalem for 1000 years. The best that can be attained is for all three to have their ‘place’ in Jerusalem.


111 posted on 12/09/2011 4:03:48 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Newt says amnesty isn't amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


Correction to #111. Turks did not rule for 1000 yrs, maybe 500. Before that, Jerusalem was under various Arab rulers, most notably the caliphate of Abd al- Malik.


114 posted on 12/09/2011 4:26:26 PM PST by La Enchiladita (Newt says amnesty isn't amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson