Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: upchuck
There is no proof, the mendacious accusers have either hidden or been totally discredited so why should Herman Cain keep drawing attention to the politically motivated—and racist—falsehoods by doing ANYTHING about them?

Clinton “moved” on and he was guilty as Hell—why can't Cain who has no credible evidence against him do the same? It's political suicide to even acknowledge the Leftist and RINO smear campaign IMHO.

8 posted on 12/01/2011 4:45:45 AM PST by Happy Rain ( "Where's the BLUE DRESS? you liberal and RINO scum!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Happy Rain
Clinton “moved” on and he was guilty as Hell—why can't Cain who has no credible evidence against him do the same? It's political suicide to even acknowledge the Leftist and RINO smear campaign IMHO.

Because -- unfortunately -- American voters simply didn't care and actually seemed charmed by Clinton's dalliances. After the revelations about Lewinski came to light, his popularity climbed significantly. However, when a conservative is accused -- not even guilty but simply accused -- the assumption is he's unfit for office.

It sucks.. but it's reality.

44 posted on 12/01/2011 5:26:51 AM PST by ScottinVA (I miss America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson