>>>But when it comes to earmarks, you are either part of the problem or part of the solution.<<<
I believe you do not understand earmarks. Once budgeted, the money is going to be spent, one way or another. Why not spend it transparently.
The real problem is not earmarks, but the budgeting process.
Ron Paul sponsored or co-sponsored 8 earmarks totalling $27,066,000 in fiscal year 2008 ranking 163rd out of 435 representatives.
Yes, I agree. But the waste and corruption has to stop somewhere. Paul can't do it alone. But Paul - or someone like him - must stand up and boldly lead the way on this.
Perhaps the budget should be suggested by the (supposedly) neutral Congressional Budget Office. That's not unconstitutional. Congress can solicit advice from whoever they wish. Let the CBO suggest where the money is to be spent, impartially. Then let Congress vote on the plan, up or down.
If the CBO plan is voted down, so be it. Then back to business as usual. But then we'll see who really puts pork over country.
Yeah, I know I'm dreaming...