These laughable "urinalists" who denigrate his stature are pipsqueaks in comparison.
Also, although Pruden refers to Romney as boring, you notice that he doesn't list his flip-flops and socialist policies. Gee, I wonder why?
FR should start a list of phony "conservative" journalists who are in the tank for Romney. I'll start:
- The entire staff of National Review
- Wes Pruden
To me, Newt’s good outweighs the bad. That’s saying a lot, since he’s done and said many boneheaded things in the past.
However, when you consider what was actually done under his watch versus Romney - it’s not even a contest.
To Newt, or not to Newt?