Republican nominee, Romney, will lose to Obama thanks to the rich, the poor, union workers and the media. America hyper inflates away what little wealth remains after 100 years of progressive, Keynesian economic policies and millions of baby-boomers die poor, miserable deaths.
Have a nice day!
Maybe the sheeple should have nominated George W. Romney in 1968 instead of the perfidious Nixon, and we wouldn’t be dealing with Mittens now. A Romney would have already had “his turn.”
Jeez!
You don’t have to sound so happy about it! >sarc
Since mittens fails the purity test, name one that meets it. Herman thinks Cuban is a language and he is the closest thing to a conservative albeit he does not know what a pro-life position is. Newt has no ground game and will have his adultery vetted all over the place. Michelle is my choice but not exactly getting traction. Santorum is tractionless too only worse. Perry won’t take the marbles out of his mouth and will hack sawed in a debate. I am not seeing a solution here.
>>>Republican nominee, Romney, will lose to Obama thanks to the rich, the poor, union workers and the media. America hyper inflates away what little wealth remains after 100 years of progressive, Keynesian economic policies and millions of baby-boomers die poor, miserable deaths.<<<
That’s how it looks if you use current trends to make reasonable predictions.
The problem is that the impact of hyperinflation, or the continuing Marxist interregnum, the impending deaths of millions... all of these things would spin off into unpredictable directions. In fact, that kind of unpredictability is actually more frightening than your prediction, which is pretty damn bad.
My best guess is that some places will weather the storm, and some places will be hellholes. I just hope I’m in one of those places that rides out the disaster... assuming, of course, that such a place exists.
God help us.