[FredZarguna]

Nothing strange is going on here accept for the conspiracy theorists. Sandusky would have known the identity of the child regardless of what actually did or did not happen, because Curley and Schultz told him to stop bringing Second Mile program kids onto campus after the incident.

[Zeppo]

Sandusky would have known the identity of the child regardless of what actually did or did not happen, because Curley and Schultz told him to stop bringing Second Mile program kids onto campus after the incident.

That puts him in the position of saying that nothing happened, but he knows who it didn't happen to. Not unlike a person accused of stealing a $50,000 car who denies stealing it and also claims that it wasn't even worth $35,000.

Maybe it doesn't rise to the level of an admission against interest, but the attorney's statement ends up giving the impression that the accused is admitting that "something" happened, even if it's not tantamount to admitting to the actual charges against him.