Posted on 11/14/2011 8:43:02 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
Not at all. What I’m questioning is the fact that of all the bad actors here, Paterno is the only one to have been fired outright. Nothing has been said whether Sandusky lost his emeritus status; Curley, Shultz, and McQuery are on paid leave while the investigation continues; Spanier is still a tenured professor. Sandusky was prevented by Paterno from getting the head coaching job in 98. Spanier has been trying for years to get rid of Paterno because JoePa got in the way of his LGBT friendly agenda. Curley and Schultz were both judged by the Grand Jury report as not being credible - Paterno was said to be cooperating and truthful. McQuery, well what is the locker room story today? If the trustees were going to get rid of anybody, they had a lot better choices than JoePa. Plot against Paterno - ESPN and Sports Illustrated have been leading the push to retire Paterno for years, and the Boston Herald reported an anonymous trustee saying the sudden firing of Paterno happened because of media pressure. Maybe my problem is I read too much trying to see all sides of the issue, and I thought a contrary opinion might be useful. On several other threads I posted links to some articles.
Real question is how much money changed hands.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.