Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chemical, nuclear weapons found in Libya (about a month ago - mustard gas missiles)
New Kerala ^ | 10/31/11

Posted on 10/31/2011 5:58:58 AM PDT by Libloather

Chemical, nuclear weapons found in Libya

Moscow, Oct 31 : Nuclear and chemical weapons have been found in Libya and the post-Gaddafi regime in the country has no interest in keeping them, acting prime minister Mahmoud Jibril has said.

Jibril said foreign inspectors would arrive later this week to investigate the finds, according to the Al Arabiya TV network.

Another official of the ruling National Transitional Council said the country was in close contact with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to define the composition of the exact materials of the weapons.

"By making this announcement, we reaffirm that the new Libya is a peaceful Libya, a Libya that abides by international law, a Libya that aims for development before anything else for the good of its people," Jibril was quoted as saying.

He refused to give details on the location and quantity of the weapons. "There are international organisations taking care of this issue," he said.

Slain leader Muammar Gaddafi officially gave up his nuclear weapons programme in 2004 to strengthen Libya's ties with the West.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chemical; libya; nuclear; wmd
Chemical weapons sites found in Libya, officials say
Tripoli, Libya (CNN) -- Libya's new authorities found chemical weapons about a month ago and asked for international aid in securing them, a top military spokesman for the National Transitional Council told CNN Monday. "We found mustard gas missiles in Jufra and we asked our friends to come and help us," Col. Ahmed Bani said.
1 posted on 10/31/2011 5:58:59 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

And Jabril..the new Libyan bossman, and FORMER Justice Minister under Qadafi, has clean hands?..yeah, sure..what a crock..


2 posted on 10/31/2011 6:03:09 AM PDT by ken5050 (Cain/Gingrich 2012!!! because sharing a couch with Pelosi is NOT the same as sharing a bed with her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Yeah, their friends in Lebanon, Hezbollah.


3 posted on 10/31/2011 6:07:32 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

You can bet the nukes were unusable or they would have stashed them. Or maybe they are hiding the usable nukes they found and turning over the “junk”.


4 posted on 10/31/2011 6:18:16 AM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (To the left the truth looks Right-Wing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Nuclear and chemical weapons have been found in Libya and you can bet your bottom dollar that al-Qaeda either does or will soon have them too.


5 posted on 10/31/2011 6:20:34 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
"He refused to give details on the location and quantity of the weapons. "There are international organisations taking care of this issue," he said."

I don't suppose Americans might be included in that group, eh what?

YOU know ... someone with the clout to definitively say, "Bush was right."

6 posted on 10/31/2011 6:25:38 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knarf
"There are international organizations taking care of this issue," he said."

OH, .... you mean like the U.N.'s Blinkey and Pedophile did in Iraq?

As for Americans might be included in that group, who might admit that "Bush was right," LeftLiberalStream/MohammedanStreamMedia and "PolyTics would never allow that. They should but never will.

7 posted on 10/31/2011 6:55:07 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: SandRat
As for Americans might be included in that group, who might admit that "Bush was right,"

I'm a bit confused here.

Bush didn't invade Iraq because he thought Libya had chemical weapons.

And Bush normalized relation with Libya on 2004 based on the idea that they'd given up all their chemical weapons and nuclear items.

9 posted on 10/31/2011 7:07:23 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Well, it’s news because they were supposed to have given everything up:

December 19, 2003: Libya’s Foreign Ministry publicly renounces the country’s WMD programs. Tripoli promises to eliminate its chemical and nuclear weapons programs, adhere to its commitments under the NPT and BWC, as well as accede to the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Libya also promises to limit the range and payloads of its missiles to conform to guidelines set by the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR). Additionally, Libya agrees to conclude an additional protocol to its IAEA safeguards agreement. The protocol expands the IAEA’s authority to check for clandestine nuclear activities. Libya invites inspectors to verify compliance with the agreements and assist in the dismantling of its weapons programs.

U.S. and British officials hail the announcement. Bush says that “far better” relations between Washington and Tripoli are possible if the latter fully implements its commitments and “demonstrates its seriousness.” Bush promises U.S. help to “build a more free and prosperous” Libya if the country achieves “internal reform.”

2004

Tripoli also accedes to the CWC. Under the convention, Libya must completely destroy its chemical weapons stockpiles and production capacity by April 29, 2007.

January 18, 2004: U.S. and British officials arrive in Libya to begin elimination and removal of WMD designs and stockpiles. Assistant Secretary of State for Verification and Compliance Paula DeSutter later tells the Senate Foreign Relations Committee February 26 that the Libyan officials are “forthcoming about the myriad aspects” of Libya’s WMD programs.

January 27, 2004: U.S. officials airlift about 55,000 pounds of documents and components from Libya’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs to the United States. The nuclear-related material includes uranium hexafluoride (the feedstock for centrifuges), two complete second-generation centrifuges from Pakistan, and additional centrifuge parts, equipment, and documentation.

On March 15, Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham calls the airlift “only the tip of the iceberg,” representing just 5 percent of the total amount of material the United States will eventually recover from Libya.

Although the report states that Libya received nuclear weapons design documents from the Khan network, the IAEA cites no evidence that Libya ever undertook steps to build a nuclear weapon.

March 5, 2004: Libyan officials submit a complete declaration of the state’s chemical weapons stockpile and facilities. According to the OPCW, the declared stockpile includes approximately 23 metric tons of mustard gas and more than 1,300 metric tons of precursor chemicals, but no filled munitions.

March 8, 2004: The United States, with assistance from British and IAEA officials, arranges for 13 kilograms of highly enriched uranium, a fissile material, to be airlifted from Libya to Russia for disposal.

June 28, 2004: Announcing that Washington and Tripoli will resume direct diplomatic ties, Burns inaugurates a new U.S. Liaison Office in Libya.

September 20, 2004: The United States lifts most of its remaining sanctions on Libya. Bush terminates the national emergency declared in 1986 under IEEPA, as well as revokes related executive orders. This action ends the remaining sanctions under IEEPA and ends the need for Treasury Department licenses for trade with Libya.

The United States also permits direct air flights between the two countries, as well as unfreezes Libyan assets in the United States. Additionally, Bush waives prohibitions on extending certain U.S. export assistance programs to Libya and on the ability of U.S. taxpayers to claim credits for taxes paid to Libya.

Libya is still subject to some sanctions as it remains on the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism. These sanctions include prohibitions on arms exports and Department of Defense contracts. The United States also is required to oppose loans from international financial institutions to such countries and impose export controls on dual-use items.

Two days later, DeSutter tells the House International Relations Committee that verification of Libya’s disarmament tasks is “essentially complete,” adding that the United States, working with the United Kingdom, has completed verifying “with reasonable certainty that Libya has eliminated, or has set in place the elimination of” its weapons programs.


10 posted on 10/31/2011 7:12:12 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

It’s the side issue that if Col Daffy Duck lied then Saddam lied too, if Col Daffy Duck hid his then Saddam hid his too.


11 posted on 10/31/2011 7:19:20 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

Support Free Republic

13 posted on 10/31/2011 10:05:50 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson