Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Waters: Scrap the supercommittee
The Hill ^

Posted on 10/14/2011 9:58:59 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Rep. Waters: Scrap the supercommittee By Mario Trujillo - 10/14/11 12:12 PM ET

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) wants to kill off the new deficit-cutting supercommittee, which she called secretive and a threat to the democratic process.

Waters introduced a bill Thursday night that would amend the debt-ceiling deal approved in early August by eliminating the bipartisan committee created under the deal to find more deficit cuts.

Under the debt deal, the 12-member panel must find at least $1.2 trillion in deficit cuts by Nov. 21. If it fails, automatic cuts will be triggered in defense and domestic spending programs.

Waters’s legislation would kill the committee and eliminate the automatic triggers, but would not undo the debt-limit increase.

“[A]re you comfortable with 12 people making over a trillion [dollars] in cuts with no input behind [closed doors]?” Waters tweeted Friday about her legislation.

Waters introduced her measure on the eve of the deadline for congressional committees to recommend cost-cutting measures to the super-panel.

In a statement released by her office Friday, Waters criticized Republicans for seeking steep spending cuts without negotiating on tax reforms.

“The Tea Party has so rigged the law that regardless of whether the supercommittee fails or succeeds to meet its goal, it is likely that the end result will be draconian spending cuts to critical programs,” Water’s office said in a statement.

Waters was a vocal critic of the deal even before it was passed. She lamented deal to raise the deferal debt limit as the worst piece of legislation to come out of Congress, and questioned the supercommittee’s constitutionality in a floor statement before the legislation was voted on.

“I am very concerned with the precedent set by this 'supercommittee,' whose establishment threatens our democratic process with its unconstitutional structure,” Waters said on Aug. 1.

Opposition to the committee has come from both sides of the aisle. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), the most vocal opponent of the committee among presidential hopefuls, said the committee was doomed to fail, and criticized its secret nature at a debate in August.

“What they ought to do is scrap the committee right now [and] recognize it is a dumb idea,” Gingrich said at the Fox News/Washington Examiner debate. “Go back to regular legislative business and give every subcommittee the task of finding savings. Do it out in the open through regular legislative order, and get rid of this secret phony business.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Sub-Driver
I agreed with her on something else recently (on completely different reasoning)...

...which can only mean one thing.


21 posted on 10/14/2011 10:27:51 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Must mean she might be indicted if this went through.


22 posted on 10/14/2011 10:29:32 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Blind squirrel finds acorn...........


23 posted on 10/14/2011 10:30:07 AM PDT by Red Badger (Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WellyP; PBRSTREETGANG; Charles Martel

24 posted on 10/14/2011 10:32:03 AM PDT by Red Badger (Furthermore, I think Obama must be impeached....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

I cannot believe I am agreeing with Maxine Waters but for once in her sad effed up life she is right. This super committee IMHO is unconstitutional and changes the structure of Congress. It never should have been voted in and it needs to go.


25 posted on 10/14/2011 10:35:12 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

A stopped clock is...


26 posted on 10/14/2011 10:44:09 AM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Broken clock?


27 posted on 10/14/2011 10:51:36 AM PDT by Chuckster (The longer I live the less I care about what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
I feel the same way. As Newt said, it is one of the dumbest ideas to come down the road. What Waters doesn't like is that the triggers will more than likely be the result with half of the amount coming from discretionary spending.
28 posted on 10/14/2011 10:55:21 AM PDT by ImpBill (196th Light Infantry Brigade - DaNang PhuBai/Hue - Little "r" republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Note to Maxine:

Shoving NObamacare down out throats was a ‘threat to the democratic process”.

Does that bother you at all???


29 posted on 10/14/2011 10:59:58 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Yep. Nothing will be gained by convening more secret meetings.


30 posted on 10/14/2011 11:25:50 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
It's a ploy. If the Republicans were not controlled by the elitist Republican establishment that cried and cowered away their leverage over the administration, they would attach an amendment to the legislation repealing the entire debt agreement that would STOP THE DEFICIT SPENDING immediately. Fat chance the RINOs in charge are smart enough or brave enough to do it.
31 posted on 10/14/2011 11:31:53 AM PDT by cashless (Unlike Obama and his supporters, I'd rather be a TEA BAGGER than a TEA BAGGEE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) wants to kill off the new deficit-cutting supercommittee, which she called secretive and a threat to the democratic process.

Wow, she and I actually AGREE on something.

32 posted on 10/14/2011 11:35:34 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Watch what people DO, not what they say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson