Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

A couple, heterosexual or homosexual, who have never had sex with anyone else have zero chance of contracting AIDS or HIV, regardless of what sexual activities they engage in.

My comment with regard to highly promiscuous heterosexual anal sex was a hypothetical, of course, as I am unaware of any human group that engages in such, outside of the porn industry, anyway.

But if they did, the health effects would be much the same as for homosexuals, who DO engage in such behavior, and which is the reason for their high risk status.

“Experts even recommend that homosexual couples in long-term, “monogamous” relationships STILL wear “protection” to prevent possible infection.”

Well of course they do! For one thing, it is well-known that “long-term” and “monogamous” have very different meanings for many homosexuals than to the general population. For the other reason, the infective status of either partner prior to the start of the relationship is a very real risk.

When it comes to potential infection, with AIDS or any other STD, you essentially have sex with everybody your partner has ever had sex with. If that number is one, as in a truly monogamous rather than serially polygamous relationship, the risk is zero. The risk factor increases dramatically with each additional contact either partner has ever had.

Long-term monogamous relationships do absolutely nothing to protect one if one’s partner comes into the relationship infected due to prior activities.


27 posted on 10/13/2011 8:44:11 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
A couple, heterosexual or homosexual, who have never had sex with anyone else have zero chance of contracting AIDS or HIV, regardless of what sexual activities they engage in.

Yes, although it would be wrong to suggest that if homosexual behavior can be "tamed" and "normalized" it will be innocuous (not that you have). The promiscuity factor goes hand-in-hand with the unnatural vice and the refusal to subordinate impulse to will (or even just the sheer perversity of the will)

44 posted on 10/14/2011 3:23:53 AM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson