Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/05/2011 1:06:35 PM PDT by Gomez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Gomez
Two problems here ~ these are just more punks from New York who don't like people talking back to them.

The other problem is New York ~ they never agreed with the Bill of Rights, still don't want it, think everybody else (meaning themselves) would be better off without it.

Time to get Barry Goldwater's saw and cut these guys off!

Then, fill in the hole with garbage from throughout the rest of the country for a couple of years. No one will notice the difference!

2 posted on 10/05/2011 1:10:43 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gomez

” Of course, making someone’s action illegal based on how someone else feels about it is all kinds of crazy “

See also —

>”Hostile Work Environment”
>”Emotional Spousal Abuse”
>”Hate Speech”


3 posted on 10/05/2011 1:11:09 PM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gomez
Do the folks writing this bill not realize how widely this will be abused?

They know EXACTLY how widely it will be abused. After all, they're essentially the same people who brought us "hate crime" legislation.

4 posted on 10/05/2011 1:12:17 PM PDT by WayneS (Comments now include 25% more sarcasm at NO additional charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gomez
Sticks and stones may...

Oh hell, forget it. They wouldn't understand anyway.

5 posted on 10/05/2011 1:13:25 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gomez
Proponents of a more refined First Amendment argue that this freedom should be treated not as a right but as a privilege — a special entitlement granted by the state on a conditional basis that can be revoked if it is ever abused or maltreated.

So in the ever-changing leftist lexicon, "refined" is now a synonym for "idiotic."

6 posted on 10/05/2011 1:58:41 PM PDT by Maceman (Obama: As American as nasei goreng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gomez

Parents have in their own hands the means to protect their kids from “cyber bullying” (and any other form of bullying).

Our kids don’t need more law masquerading as “better” laws, regarding “bullying”.

The child most affected by the bully is the child who is not led to not allow the bully to cow them in the first place. The bully’s only strength is in the weakness of the child they are bullying. The antidotes for that are supplied by better parents, not so called “better” laws.


7 posted on 10/05/2011 2:16:00 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gomez

All that? That bill would shut up 99% of Democrats and Liberals including Left wing hate talk radio plus people like Ed Shultz and Chris Matthews. Then too it’d shut down Daily KOS. I say go for it.


9 posted on 10/05/2011 2:30:42 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Talent Without Ambition Is Bad, Ambition Without Talent Is Worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gomez
"bullycide???

I don't even know what to say. Good grief. No offense intended. s/ Please excuse the s/...s/

10 posted on 10/05/2011 2:46:15 PM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson