“The blind trust her lawyers are likely setting up can handle the law suit while she runs.”
I wasn’t concerned about a legal conflict of interest. I was concerned that it might not (in the opinion of some - not me I emphasize) that suing him wasn’t “presidential.” Meaning could/would it hurt her in an election? Would liberals attempt to paint her as someone who is stiffling the “freedom of the press?”
Sarah is smart and understands public perceptions. Since she knows how this could be spun against her, did her pursuing it signal she had decided not to run? Or, is it actually the opposite?
Thanks. Understand your point.
However, don’t think the libs can say she is stiffing the freedom of the press here, since the proof that it is all lies is already on the record.
There's a war on!
Tea Partiers want a candidate they’re sure will fight for them. Seeing the Momma Grizzly fight for her family against the corrupt evil establishment will make them ecstatic. My only question is how long has Breitbart been sitting on these e-mails? And had he clued Sarah in on their existence? Had they just been waiting to see whether Sloppy Joe et al would be dumb enough to finish the tort? And if so planning to jiu jitsu liberal hate and stupidity into the most unconventional election launch in history. One that converts three years of the left’s negative campaigning into legally admitted or proven “making things up.”