Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

It does sort of depend on what the meaning of “species” is, doesn’t it.

What do you call two or more groups of animals, not subspecies of the same species, who can freely mate and produce fertile offspring? I’m assuming that they would all be within the same genus, but suppose they were also other similar species within the genus that could NOT produce fertile offspring?

Is there such a biological word? It’s been a long time since high school.


48 posted on 08/10/2011 1:17:52 PM PDT by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: chesley

What do you call two or more groups of animals that are not subspecies of the same species, but who can mate and produce fertile offspring?

Closely related.

For example: Tigers and Lions are closely related members of the feline ‘family’ that can produce fertile offspring.

Another example: Coyotes and Wolves are closely related members of the canine ‘family’ that can produce fertile offspring.

Words are, and always will be, imprecise reflections of reality. They are not themselves real, nor do they dictate reality.


49 posted on 08/10/2011 1:23:08 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson