Naaah. I've wasted too much time on you already.
That’s what I thought. Good night.
Why didn’t they charge her with corpse abuse, can they do that now? Endangerment?
Also, if the jury in any way bought the drowning story—why wouldn’t they nail her with child abuse/neglect? Involuntary manslaughter. I understand skipping the verdict of—1st degree murder—I wouldn’t have went for that, either. No matter what my mother thinks :p
(child abuse and manslaughter were a choice, no?)
Why would George be responsible for a drowning and not Casey—Casey was the mother. Is this like Obamacare?!?! The parents are responsible until 25! Is this the new standard?
People are charged with manslaughter for drownings etc plenty—the theory that the illegally talking jury believed. (according to comments by juror 14)
http://www.goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080716/NEWS02/807160336
http://www.militarysos.com/forum/news/75231-baby-sitter-19-drinking-before-2-toddlers-drowned.html
sleeping with an adult as police offered Casey as an ‘out’
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/41004267.html
There were so many other choices—I just DON’T understand!