Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DrewsMum

There was certainly more than “feel” in this trial. To deny that, is to deny reality.There were facts and evidence even without a fingerprint or some DNA.

If there was a fingerprint or DNA, what would it prove, really? Casey was the mother, her chit belonged there—Cindy and George, too.

There was NONE on the tape because it had rotted, water-logged etc. Some DNA showed up, shed from the investigatorsmahoohas, but that DNA did NOT cover or hide any other DNA.

The state should have brought on Jesse Grund—that shower at his place etc. He had MUCH to tell...


2,329 posted on 07/05/2011 10:54:42 PM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2325 | View Replies ]


To: Irenic

No, I’m not saying that a fingerprint would have been the answer to it all. I am saying that I think the case created way more questions than it even started with. George Anthony lied on the stand. That bothers me. He’s hiding something. Also, I am bothered by the meter reader and his moving/not moving the body....I did miss that part of the trial...I missed part of the issue about the deputy being rude and not looking just a few feet from where he was standing for the body or something. Can you fill me in there?


2,339 posted on 07/05/2011 11:25:54 PM PDT by DrewsMum (There is no other NAME whereby we may be saved....JESUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson