“The plain and simple fact of this case is the prosecution blew it big time. They had a weak case to begin with, presented what evidence in a haphazard manner to the point that the theory of their case was constantly shifting throughout the trial and ending up in the embarrassing position of being caught laughing at the opposing side during closing arguments and finally nearly begging for a verdict on the final close.”
-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—
Not exactly what Levin said about this, but close.
I respect his take on this case more than any other view I have heard.
I heard Levin last night.
He actually said that “the strand of hair” was 30 feet from the car in the house. That the state had no case.
I am DISGUSTED by Levin that he didn’t even know the evidence, and goes on national radio to criticize the prosecution of this case. He said he hadn’t followed this case, and just read up on it.