Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
I think that started in the OJ trial when the defense kept saying all the evidence was ‘circumstantial’ in a way that made it sound like they were saying “full of $h!t”

Circumstantial has come to mean ‘unsubstantial’ in many people's minds, and that is a bad thing.

MOST evidence in EVERY case is circumstantial. People rarely commit crimes in full daylight in front of witnesses.

173 posted on 07/05/2011 10:04:09 AM PDT by Mr. K (CAPSLOCK! -Unleash the fury! [Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K
Yes, while reading what constituted circumstantial evidence an example was this: direct evidence is seeing someone shoot another person; circumstantial would be watching them follow that person into a house, carrying a gun and hear the shot fired.

Knowing now how often folks lie under oath, I think the circumstantial evidence holds more weight.

177 posted on 07/05/2011 10:12:07 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Going into Rehab means never having to say you are sorry....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. K

True! Although, if you’ve ever watched the Law & Order UK version, they solve EVERY case with video! lol They must have a camera on every single street from every angle!


190 posted on 07/05/2011 10:25:20 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Going into Rehab means never having to say you are sorry....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson