[Dilbert San Diego]

We’re not allowed to consider consequences or any of that.

The liberals have told us that it’s discriminatory not to allow homosexual marriage. They have told us that defining marriage in the traditional way is bigoted and hateful.

They say that discrimination against homosexuals is just like racial discrimination.

Against the backdrop of how the debate has been framed by the liberals, we can’t discuss any consequences or impacts of allowing homosexual marriage.

We can’t talk about whether it will be good for society to make this change. We are told that it’s discriminatory not to allow homosexual marriage, not that it would be beneficial to society to allow it.

[fwdude]

You're exactly right, Dilbert. As far as the homo-activists are concerned, the case is closed and debate is cancelled. They used to incessantly ask us to explain to them one way that homo-"marriage" would affect anyone else. We gave them many substantial ways, but they cupped their hands over their ears and refused to listen. They were never willing to listen, even after the fallout of same-sex marriage began to materialize in jurisdictions which allowed this contrivance. They constantly cover up research findings that condemn their viewpoint, and prop up questionable "studies" that seem to support their positions.

It is purely political and completely unreasonable. We can't expect them to be reasonable in the least.