Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb

I just emailed the “writer”. This has NOTHING to do with “assault weapons”. I particularly like how (as we all know) we’re talking about semi-auto variants, yet the “author” felt it was necessary to define what “true” assault weapons are. Oh yeah, and lets throw in “AK-47” for no reason, just to get everybody’s blood pressure up because it’s a really scary firearm. Typical anti-gun hit piece.

Oh, and Mr. Sheriff? If you’d do your damn job, the people wouldn’t have to be out there trying to catch the criminals. So check your little anti-gun attitude at the door and start catching the bad guys, like you were hired to do.


21 posted on 06/22/2011 4:39:42 AM PDT by Cacique500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cacique500

You could duct-tape a bayonet on the end of an Ruger .22 rifle and these dumb bastards would call it an “assault rifle!”


28 posted on 06/22/2011 5:10:03 AM PDT by donozark (Not all heroes wear tights and a cape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Cacique500
>"lets throw in “AK-47” for no reason,"

The same kind Ricky & Racky are were supplying the Mexican Terrorists?

62 posted on 06/22/2011 6:26:16 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (It is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; ~Vattel's Law of Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson