Skip to comments.Live thread: Wisconsin Supreme Court election - Prosser vs Kloppenburg
Posted on 04/05/2011 4:56:48 PM PDT by Jean SEdited on 04/05/2011 8:26:32 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
This election is important nationally too. If Kloppenburg is elected the Wisconsin mandate by the electorate in 2010 in this state will be negated by the WI Supreme Court and the unions will have won.
I live in a hardcore conservative area and discovered today that my Prosser yardsign was mutilated and thrown into one of my plantings.
Pray for Wisconsin and for Prosser's election!
LIVE ELECTION RESULTS HERE
VOTES BY COUNTY
But Dane has one more precinct and Milwaukee has two remaining.
It was a good fight, though.
“Not surprising, though... the dems almost always win the close ones.”
Yes, they do. The system in Wisconsin, like many states, is not set up well to prevent voter fraud. In a recount Democrats have a system to count votes until they win and then stop.
Conflicting reports on whether or not all of Milwaukee is in—but the last twelve precincts were all from areas favourable to us. When it went from twelve to two, the movement was actually favourable. The Dane precinct, according to an earlier post, only has five registered voters.
Prosser - 738,228
Communist - 738,368
Not looking good, with 10 precincts still to report, only 3 of which are Prosser-leaning.
Suak = Sauk
imo, when the margin is this close there is almost guaranteed to be cheating of some sort. It’s too easy to come up with a few ballots here and there to make the difference. No one will notice 10 here, 25 there, 15 there, 20 there.
...which means that precinct will go for Kloppenburg by a 48-0 count.
Sorry...just not much faith in this country's fraud-plagued electoral system anymore.
Good point on Fox, Klopencommy wouldn’t take the Seat for almost four months, plenty of time for the SC to make a decision with the presnt make up of Judges.
Actually, given the way the vote came in, Suk would be better.
Yep. It worked beautifully for them in MN. Once Franken got that lead, IIRC, that's pretty much what they did. Never mind the fact several hundred felons' votes were counted for Franken.
I know I shouldn’t think like this, but wouldn’t it be nice, if just once, some of our counties “found” just enough ballots at the eleventh hour? Maybe that would cause enough people to pay attention and help clean up our elections.
Dane and the 2 Crawford are now in with no change in totals—this is relatively good news.
She’s up by 369 now...it’s done
Supreme Court REPORTING 99%
Joanne Kloppenburg 738,883 50%
David Prosser (inc) 738,514 50%
She’s got this one. The final margin will be 600+.
When the ‘Pubs start “winning” close elections, then this kind of crap will stop. Only then. Until that time, the ‘Rats have no incentive to change, they always manufacture enough votes to “win” close elections. If we start “finding” so-called “lost” ballots and those end up going 100% for the ‘Pubs, as opposed to 100% for the ‘Rats like they do now, then and only then will there be calls for “safeguards” to be put in place.
|Wisconsin - County Vote Results||
|April 06, 2011 - 10:49AM ET||(i) = incumbent||= winner||= runoff|
|Supreme Court - General|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.