[Red Steel]

I have to wonder why someone would vote against having any prez candidate show proof of eligibility. Seems that it should have always been that way.

Little Jameeeeseeee7777, they guy who posted this thread, would vote against presidential eligibility laws with glee.

[Mortrey]

I THOUGHT I recognized the troll!

Thanks, Red Steel!

[jamese777]

Little Jameeeeseeee7777, they guy who posted this thread, would vote against presidential eligibility laws with glee.

---

Nah, I have no problem at all with states having presidential eligiblity laws.
I know that the Full Faith and Credit clause of the US Constitution will prevail and any official proof of birth that any state authorizes will be accepted by every other state or the District of Columbia and that would include the state of Hawaii’s Certificate of Live Birth. I know that any eligibility law that passes and is signed into law by a governor will pass constitutional muster.

I would hate for the conservative presidential candidate with the best chance of defeating Barack Hussein Obama II in 2012 to be a person who happened to be born in a state that has a current Democratic governor who might refuse to issue a long form birth certificate to that candidate; which could keep him or her off the ballot in some states.
Whatever a state says is an official record of birth will work in every other state.

Article Four/Section One would make the above impossible.

[Brown Deer]

and probably voted a few times for 0bama.