Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel; patlin

The judge in the Haw Haw case ruled..”Joyce claimed British citizenship”

Joyce was born in the US.

Obama claimed British citizenship..it is on his website.

Both fathers British subjects.

This means both were not born subject to the jurisdiction.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=SuUdAAAAIBAJ&sjid=OE4EAAAAIBAJ&pg=5038,713432&dq=born+subject+to+jurisdiction&hl=en


34 posted on 03/11/2011 9:20:18 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: bushpilot1; patlin

“The judge in the Haw Haw case ruled..”Joyce claimed British citizenship”

Joyce was born in the US.

Obama claimed British citizenship..it is on his website.

Both fathers British subjects.

This means both were not born subject to the jurisdiction.”

Lord Haw Haw could have been tried for treason in the US too. Split allegiances.

Combine this case with Kawakita v. United States makes a powerful argument to the addition to the other encyclopaedia size amount of evidence that Obama cannot be a natural born citizen (only one state allegiance) in accordance with the US Constitution.

As I recall, Wong Kim Ark also was in violation of the Empire of China by accepting US citizenship where the punishment could have been death if China prosecuted him.

Split allegiances again can cause bad things to happen.


42 posted on 03/11/2011 10:11:30 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson