Glenn Beck TV thread February 4th 2011

FOX news Glenn Beck ^ | February 4th 2011 | Glenn Beck

[combat_boots]

Good work. Needs to be on the live thread.

[cripplecreek]

I saw this guy a few days ago and he really impressed me when he said that he and all muslims in America should expect suspicion and they have no one to blame but themselves no matter how moderate they are.

He basically accused his fellow “moderate” muslims of not standing up to islam in the modern world.

[353FMG]

The hornets cannot be slapped down by words alone. They are flying into the country by the plane load.

[jobim]

So Beck has reported nothing you don't know in a year? What a storehouse you must be. But even if you, in your magnificence, know it ALL, is Beck doing work you think valuable if he is telling a very large audience things they don't know? Or is he just a speck of detritus in your all-seeing, all-knowing eye? Whose side do you think Beck is on?

[cripplecreek]

I don’t think that Congress even cares about the muslim cancer that is spreading rapidly in our country. I don’t hear them talk about it.

I think they become too frightened of being called bigots. The muslim who was just on has said that American suspicion of muslims isn't bigotry, its justified and realistic.

[cripplecreek]

Beck doesn’t inform us, he asks us to inform ourselves.

[MestaMachine]

The site I just posted is what has been sent to Beck. Our database has over 5000 individual islamic groups crosslinked to communist, nazi, and other leftist orgs all over the world.
The sheer number is shocking.

[cripplecreek]

Next week “The Mahdi” on the show.

I’m guessing Glenn doesn’t mean he’ll be in the studio.

[cripplecreek]

The Day After the Dollar Crashes: A Survival Guide for the Rise of the New World Order

http://www.amazon.com/Day-After-Dollar-Crashes-Survival/dp/047091033X

[cripplecreek]

Longstanding foreign policy has been a mess in the mideast. Obama has just made it wildly erratic.

[combat_boots]

For folks to consider: http://www.analyst-network.com/index.php

[cripplecreek]

Interesting. Looks like a good source of news we aren’t getting.

[who knows what evil?]

Beck is back on his game...ratings are rising over 2 million viewers again...

[who knows what evil?]

If Rosenberg’s going to be on, it will be SO worth going back!

Beck said Rosenberg would be back on next week...that will be "must see TV"...

[353FMG]

>I think they become too frightened of being called bigots.<

.
Which means that they rather remain quiet on the subject of the muslim threat to our nation.

Don’t these overpaid politicians understand that this country cannot coexist with this spreading cancer, and survive? WTH is government for?

[cripplecreek]

He said next week will be on “the Mahdi”

[kimmie7]

Agreed.

[ml/nj]

Whose side do you think Beck is on?

Are you some sort of shill for Beck? What has he brought to the table in the last year? He made a career out of naming a couple of outright Communists that Obama has appointed to high positions. But that was more than a year ago. It's nice that Beck is on our side. So is Hannity. Do you think he's a brain surgeon too?

If you want to hear people with insight on the national stage you have to listen to Rush, Savage, and/or Levin. (Unfortunately Savage and Levin are on at the same time.)

ML/NJ

[jobim]

Are you some sort of shill for Beck? shill: to act as a spokesperson or promoter

No, I'm not a spokesperson, but, yes, I would consider myself a promoter. Beck and his team do the research, and then share it, through video, quotes, and books. I want as many people as possible to learn what he presents, just as I would have them listen to Rush, Levin, Steyn, etal. as you mention. I think it counterproductive to denigrate an individual who is making a difference in the national awareness of the danger we face with this administration, but also the right path for our nation as layed down by the Founding Fathers and later great thinkers such as Hayek, Friedman etal. Because you know that Obama is a socialist, does it make it any less important to read Radical-in-Chief that, in meticulous detail, chronicles his associations since the early 1980s? And Beck has on authors such as Kurtz, and Goldberg (Liberal Fascism) and David Barton etal. He nightly draws connections to Wilson and so much else. His single purpose of education is unmatched by anyone else in media. That doesn't make him the keenest analyst, but I cannot see an argument to be made that his show is not the single most educational one in media. Why would you bash Beck?

[ml/nj]

His show is basically a waste of time. That's why. I already know about Hayek et al. I don't need to hear from someone who has recently discovered them.

ML/NJ