Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marty62
He ruled the whole law is unconstitutional because it does not have aseverability clause. If we get this ruiling from the Supremes it will be the best thing for this country in my whole life.
11 posted on 01/31/2011 12:10:02 PM PST by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NRG1973

I was hoping SOME judge would hold the absence of severability over the law.

I think the Va judge ruled against the individual mandate,
but stated that the rest of it could stay despite the absence of severability.


40 posted on 01/31/2011 12:14:27 PM PST by MrB (Tagline suspended for important announcement on my about page. Click my handle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973
Thanks for answering #20 before I was even able to post it. No implied severability just because Congress usually remembers to include that clause, as the Virginia judge ruled last year.
43 posted on 01/31/2011 12:14:36 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: NRG1973

Yeeeeeeehawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww


103 posted on 01/31/2011 12:29:32 PM PST by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson