Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut
I don't claim to be a 'birther', but this new information appears to at least give the advantage to the 'birthers'.

I'm not 100 percent convinced that this information, if accurate, would enable one to conclude Obama is not a naturalized U.S. citizen.

But I will say this information, if accurate, is enough to make a reasonable assertion that there is no proof that Barack Obama is a naturalized U.S. citizen, as I believe the Constitution requires.

And that, by itself, is enough to warrant an official investigation.

24 posted on 01/25/2011 1:15:37 AM PST by zipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: zipper

If he is naturalized that in itself is proof that he isn’t a natural born citizen.


25 posted on 01/25/2011 1:18:56 AM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: zipper

“reasonable assertion that there is no proof that Barack Obama is a naturalized U.S. citizen, as I believe the Constitution requires.”

A NATURALIZED citizen does not qualify for POTUS.
One has to be NATIVE BORN.
Naturalized is for foreigners who become citizens.


26 posted on 01/25/2011 1:31:47 AM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: zipper

Agreed. Anyone else would have had to provide documentation, but Zero gets away with it? WTH?


44 posted on 01/25/2011 9:20:48 AM PST by reaganaut (Mormonism is its own worst enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson