Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: norge
“You have indicated that Loughner had previously had run-ins with the police and had threatened to kill people. Why did your department allow him 1) to buy a gun, and 2) to remain free?”

Excellent question! His remarks are typical of placing the blame elsewhere because he feel directly responsible himself. Psychiatric projection.

21 posted on 01/09/2011 12:35:26 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: BerryDingle; norge

The sheriff has no say so in who is allowed to buy a gun. Either the state can run a background check or the state can do nothing and the dealers will run the background check through the FBI. In this case, unless the nut had been involuntarily confined to a mental hospital for more than an observation period, or unless the police had arrested him for his threats where a judge had ordered him to surrender all firearms until he was judged not to be a threat (or he was convicted of a felony) there would have been no reason not to sell him a firearm.

It appears that Loughner should have been arrested by the police for making threats and charged. While in custody, it would have been fairly evident that he was mentally unbalanced and should be committed to a mental hospital.


27 posted on 01/09/2011 1:46:15 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson