Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Vitriol?" How about Left's ultimate snuff film: Death of a President (2006) & more Leftist hate
Google Search ^ | 1/9/2011 | Not applicable

Posted on 01/09/2011 10:49:35 AM PST by Wolfstar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Wolfstar

don’t forget err America’s randi rodent’s mock assassination of George Bush...

http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/27/air-americas-assassination-chic/


21 posted on 01/09/2011 11:43:56 AM PST by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
In 2006, the film "Death of a President" was released. Where was the media's outrage then?

With the editing software now available, someone could snip out the frames of George W. Bush and replace them with footage of Obama. Of course, the "re-release" of the movie would be met with howls of leftist fury - and not one single liberal voice would acknowledge the irony of their anger.

22 posted on 01/09/2011 11:44:25 AM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: juliej

I’m a fan of Rabbi Joe but my fellow Catholic, Deacon Kevin, usually finds a way to rankle me. I’m not a radio show caller but I almost picked up the phone this morning. I didn’t want to be late for Mass though!


23 posted on 01/09/2011 11:47:28 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

A civil war in 5,4,3,2..., it is inevitable when the left is driven by emotions rather than the facts.


24 posted on 01/09/2011 12:21:50 PM PST by IslamE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

And then send the list to every socialist in charge. Starting with 0.

The left can’t win on this tragedy.


25 posted on 01/09/2011 1:41:32 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

Well said, GPM. Shut them down using all legal means.


26 posted on 01/09/2011 2:28:59 PM PST by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

So true and so frustrating that the media is lopsided for the Left.


27 posted on 01/09/2011 2:35:03 PM PST by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
The meaning was clear when the DUmocrats said after 9-11 that they "LOVE New York"...

We know what DUmocrat LIEberals mean when they claim to "support the war on terrorism"...

DUmocrat LIEberals leave no doubt about what they mean when they "support the troops"...

For those DUmocrats who think you can save your party from the LOONEY DUmocrat LIEberals, they are who they always have been.

28 posted on 01/09/2011 3:57:26 PM PST by RasterMaster (The only way to open a LIEberal mind is with a brick!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

From the man himself at the top of the US food chain.

“They bring a knife, we bring a gun”
- to his supporters: “Get in their faces!”
- on ACORN Mobs: “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
- to his mercenary army: “Hit back twice as hard”
- on the private sector: “We talk to these folk. So I know whose ass to kick.“
- to voters: “Republican victory would mean hand-to-hand combat”
- to liberal supporters: “It’s time to fight for it.”
- to Latino supporters: “Punish your enemies.”
- to democrats: “I’m itching for a fight.”


29 posted on 01/09/2011 4:30:32 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Such “leadership” from nobama, the community agitator. All those who voted for this mess should hang their heads in shame.


30 posted on 01/09/2011 4:36:54 PM PST by hal ogen (1st Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Chicago thuggery language. Hey, He thru down the gauntlet...had he been more civilized and Presidential the equation would not be as is. Along with Pelosi Reid style politics and ramming their faces in ours. Well what do they expect...there comes a time ya know...


31 posted on 01/09/2011 4:46:19 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: caww

Those are good examples of Leftist “hate” speech. There are many, many more, but the left-wing propaganda arm of the DNC, otherwise known as the MSM, ignores it all.


32 posted on 01/09/2011 5:03:20 PM PST by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Personally I see none of either side as hate speech. We’ve forgotten politics is passionate and like a nasty ballroom fight. Sides are definately taken and the hash gets thrown. Keeps us all in touch with the emotional side of life and how to control it. If there’s no conflict...how does one learn to handle opposition?

Palin seems to have learned to handle and to dish it right back when favorable to her cause. She usually pounces when they aren’t looking...she’s great to watch in the ring! No body doubts she’s a fighter now in the political arena.

But on a whole this Gov. would have us all be whimps...and they the Masters...and our kids are being taught this daily. That’s a not.. and and I have no problem with those who oppose them. Short of a gunfight...and we all pray better minds will always prevail before that comes upon us.

As I have said before..the shooting was about violence and the shooter is the one who planned and pulled the triggers...remarkable is had he not been stopped...(heros stepped in) he was more than prepared to take others.


33 posted on 01/09/2011 5:19:49 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: caww
Personally I see none of either side as hate speech.

I agree with you, which is why I put hate in quotes. It's not so much that the government wants us all to be wimps, as the Left wants to shut down free speech for the Right. They've been after talk radio for a very long time and have not found a way, yet, to shut it down. :)

34 posted on 01/09/2011 5:39:13 PM PST by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Well yes..that too. I knew long ago watch who is invested and buying out the media. It’s been known who owns that power controls the mindset of the public. Most TV networks are in the Democrat’s back pocket. And Fox is barely holding their own anymore.

I hardly watch TV news anymore and talk radio is about the only way to hear what’s going on. The Democrates have been after them, just as you say. Likely in time they will be successful too as the public has less and less ‘critical thinking’ skills...rather must be spoon fed.


35 posted on 01/09/2011 7:07:08 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

At least the Deacon is pro life while Joe dances around the issue and refuses to state that devout Jews do not have abortions and consider it a sin. He takes his orders from the people in his synagogue.


36 posted on 01/10/2011 7:37:46 AM PST by juliej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

Every sheeperal I’ve talked to reacts VERY emotionally when I’ve pointed out that they inherently use the threat of deadly violence in every policy they advocate when they use the government to implement those policies.

At first they don’t understand, then, after explanation,
they usually have an argument along the lines of
“if you don’t resist, there will be no use of violence”.


37 posted on 01/10/2011 7:42:11 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IslamE

It’s not inevitable due to the left’s emotionalism,
it’s inevitable due to the left’s suppression of other means of change (soap box, ballot box, etc).


38 posted on 01/10/2011 7:43:22 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: caww; Wolfstar
Personally I see none of either side as hate speech.

I disagree. When these scum on the left say this stuff they mean it. I think they really do hate. No one could say those things and carry those signs out of "strong dislike".

39 posted on 01/10/2011 6:03:59 PM PST by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson