Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: worst-case scenario

We still have a department of energy, and a ton of redundant oversight on this issue. Frankly, it’s a market issue more than an issue requiring regulation and oversight.

I hope the next move is the reclassification of 1000’s of square miles of ‘wilderness’ to be open to drilling and development. (Mining of rare earths, for example).


16 posted on 01/06/2011 9:14:08 AM PST by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: RinaseaofDs
Whack a mole.The fed can't stop oil development in ND because most of the land is private. Now F&W pushes the effort and wants to use offshore oil and gas revenue to fund this new program which will exclude land for resource development.

http://www.fws.gov/audubon/grasslands/dgca_lpp_fact_sheet_web.pdf

130 posted on 01/07/2011 6:27:30 AM PST by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson