There is no evidence to support your statement.
There is no evidence to support your statement.
You're sure right about that, but it seems that hardly anyone posting on this thread actually read the article.
Clarifying some of the points in the article that contradict a lot of the replies that have been posted:
There is no indication Hamman ever treated a patient
Hamman's formal education consists of only an associate's degree (in general aviation flight technology) and a bachelor of science degree. After only a few years, he was a medical school drop out
As Dr. Stephen Mester, a Florida cardiologist who took one of Hamman's sessions at a cardiologist conference last spring says: "In a sense, he didn't talk about anything medical...I did not find it worthwhile"
What Hamman was doing was using his education and training in aviation simulation and applying it to medical simulations; teaching team work through the use of simulations. As it says in the article, he really wouldn't have needed to be a medical doctor to do what he was doing. Presenting himself as a medical doctor, obtaining appointments, employment positions and research grants using fake credentials, shows that Hamman is a psyche case.
There is no evidence to support your statement.
How about evidence that you read the article?