.... it’s yet another example of how the media can manipulate facts to generate a sensational and not particularly honest story ....
Just as your pot-calls-kettle-black post — apparently intended to manipulate those facts and to promote a less than honest take on an important and deadly threatening demographic — projects your attempted obfuscation of the simple facts and, more seriously, of the underlying implication contained in the original, honest, story.
That (”EU”-mandated “politically correct”)underlying implication that alludes to the reality of Islam having effectively cemented into place its looming take-over of all of Old Europe - now incorporated in the Euro-peons’ doomed Neo-Soviet (AKA the “EU”) — and including those of the Neo Soviet’s squalidly fascissocialist offshore satellite states. Those states, that is, previously known of as once-great Britain.
Can you say, EUrabia?
Garbage. I'm sorry you prefer media propaganda to facts but apparently you do. The media chose to deliberately manipulate data to give a false impression - they lied. If you don't have a problem with that, then all power to you. Personally I'd rather have the facts than media misinformation. In this case, it's quite easy to find the facts as well.
Incidentally, the media was particularly sloppy in that their articles actually missed on of the alternative spellings of Mohammed - that's why my count is three higher than theirs. So they can't even dissemble competently.
That (”EU”-mandated “politically correct”)underlying implication that alludes to the reality of Islam having effectively cemented into place its looming take-over of all of Old Europe - now incorporated in the Euro-peons’ doomed Neo-Soviet (AKA the “EU”) — and including those of the Neo Soviet’s squalidly fascissocialist offshore satellite states. Those states, that is, previously known of as once-great Britain.
I'd have more respect for your opinions if you hadn't just demonstrated you are prepared to base them on media misrepresentations to the extent you get upset when somebody points out the facts.
Can you say, EUrabia?
Yes, I can - can you say, Media Spin?
I have massive problems with the idea of the EU in general - and I have since before it was called that, back in the 1960s and 1970s. I think it's a horrendous idea, and I find it quite horrifying that the British government chose to sign up to it. The growing influence of Islam within the EU is a newer part of the problem, and a particularly concerning one - but we don't have any hope of finding a solution to that if we base our position on media lies. It needs to be based on facts and the truth. Real numbers - not manipulated ones.
Every time somebody uses a manipulated figure, they weaken any case they make based on statistics. I think the facts are serious enough that I don't want them obscured by the acceptance of lies.
How often are you in Britain? I'm a British citizen (as well as an Australian one) and I'm over there at least twice a year, and have spent extensive periods of time there. When I am there, I do what I can to try and oppose the things that are anti-British and what I can to try and improve matters. I find we have most success when people can't just dismiss our arguments as misinformed, and that means not relying on inaccurate garbage media propaganda. But on hard facts and numbers.
We have Islamic terrorists blowing up trains and buses - we don't need misinformation about baby names to show people there's a problem.