Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Army Air Corps

I am no fan of wind energy, but if, and only if, it is economically feasible would I consider it. As for batteries, I agree they may not be the answer. But, maybe compressed air storage would work. It appears Texas is playing with it because of all the old salt dome mines there:

http://www.seco.cpa.state.tx.us/re_wind-reserve.htm

Speaking of Austin, I read an interesting discussion in the book “Gusher of Lies” that said the nuke plant nearby was even cheaper than natural gas when we had that gas price spike a few years back. I would bank on nuclear before wind.


22 posted on 10/24/2010 12:02:44 PM PDT by epithermal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: epithermal

That is the problem, it is not feasible for commercial grade power needs in a free market system. If you live in a rural area and wish to generate your own power, then it can play a role. Our cities and industries need constant, reliable baseload capacity. Also, most wind farms are far, far away from the final customer, so you lose a lot of generated power from source to customer. Let us not even get into security issues related to windfarms.


25 posted on 10/24/2010 12:08:58 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: epithermal

I, too, would place my bets on nuclear power before commercial wind and solar.


26 posted on 10/24/2010 12:11:44 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson