Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Bishops of New York: Pro-Life More Important Than Health Care, Economy
Life News ^ | 10/13/10 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 10/13/2010 3:51:51 PM PDT by wagglebee

Albany, NY (LifeNews.com) -- The Catholic bishops of New York have released a new statement about the upcoming congressional elections. In a contest seeing campaigns for the House and Senate shape up as a contrast between pro-abortion and pro-life positions, the bishops say the pro-life issue is most important.

The comments are significant given the importance the economy and fiscal issues have on the minds of voters heading into November.

The New York bishops reference the Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship document the national conference of Catholic bishops released highlighting the importance of pro-life issues in elections.

That document teaches, “Those who knowingly, willingly, and directly support public policies or legislation that undermine fundamental moral principles cooperate with evil.”

As such, they say pro-life concerns trump everything else, including health care and assisting the poor.

"The inalienable right to life of every innocent human person outweighs other concerns where Catholics may use prudential judgment, such as how best to meet the needs of the poor or to increase access to health care for all," they said.

"The right to life is the right through which all others flow. To the extent candidates reject this fundamental right by supporting an objective evil, such as legal abortion, euthanasia or embryonic stem cell research, Catholics should consider them less acceptable for public office," they added.

The bishops also urge pro-life, Catholic voters to do due diligence in finding out the abortion positions of candidates.

"It is often difficult to get a good grasp on the positions of incumbent congressional representatives and state legislators, not to mention their challengers. News accounts of positions are hard to come by, and voting records on important issues are often lacking, they say.

"So the task of doing due diligence can be truly challenging. Yet our state is facing many critical issues which are of vital concern to faithful Catholics. Thus it is absolutely necessary for good citizens to take a careful look at every candidate and to vote accordingly for the better candidates," the bishops add.

Ultimately, Catholic voters should follow the pro-life moral teachings of the Catholic Church when voting.

"While we as the Bishops of New York State cannot and do not endorse candidates for office, we encourage you to properly form your conscience by reflecting on the moral and social teachings of our Church and we strongly urge you to vote on Election Day," they conclude.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; bishops; catholic; elections; moralabsolutes; prolife
"While we as the Bishops of New York State cannot and do not endorse candidates for office, we encourage you to properly form your conscience by reflecting on the moral and social teachings of our Church and we strongly urge you to vote on Election Day," they conclude.

It's about time they started saying this.

1 posted on 10/13/2010 3:51:58 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 10/13/2010 3:52:59 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Pyro7480
For your ping lists.
3 posted on 10/13/2010 3:53:35 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


4 posted on 10/13/2010 3:54:52 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

Ping


5 posted on 10/13/2010 3:57:17 PM PDT by theKid51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Absolutely right.


6 posted on 10/13/2010 3:59:26 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Amen to that...shout this loud and clear!!! Waiting for individual pastors to enforce this from the altar.


7 posted on 10/13/2010 4:05:10 PM PDT by liveoak4 (Abortion, the ultimate child abuse!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yea! I’m sure that Abp Timothy Dolan is leading this. God love him. We really miss him in Milwaukee.


8 posted on 10/13/2010 4:58:02 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic (Southeast Wisconsin, Zone 4 to 5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

**It’s about time they started saying this. **

Amen and Amen!


9 posted on 10/13/2010 10:07:43 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
To the extent candidates reject this fundamental right by supporting an objective evil, such as legal abortion, euthanasia or embryonic stem cell research, Catholics should consider them less acceptable for public office

I don't like the implication of a sliding grade here. The truth is that a candidate who rejects any pro-life plank is therefore pro-death and is wholly unacceptable for public office. We may end up choosing between two unacceptables -- we often do -- but that is not the same as pretending that one is less acceptable than the other.

10 posted on 10/14/2010 5:26:04 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annalex
I agree.
11 posted on 10/14/2010 5:27:50 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: annalex
We may end up choosing between two unacceptables -- we often do

We have the option of voting for neither of them.

12 posted on 10/14/2010 5:34:10 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Bump for the Bishops!


13 posted on 10/14/2010 6:54:04 AM PDT by GonzoII ("That they may be one...Father")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Yes, and there is nothing wrong in exercising that option.

In fact, increasingly, the important elections are local and primary elections, where we still have a chance to change the direction in a radical way, and often have a solid pro-life candidate.


14 posted on 10/14/2010 4:51:53 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson