Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Servant of the Cross
I don't think Kathryn intends that it is to be 'stay-at-home' only either.

No, she seems to be talking about a variety of vocational options. However, she then goes on to imply that it's the responsibility of someone other than each individual woman to facilitate the woman's choices.

As soon as anyone, man or woman, says that he or she has "no choice" but to engage in some activity they don't wish to, that person has chosen to define himself as helpless, rather than functional. This is what the author is doing on behalf of "American woman" ... saying that "she" isn't capable of making decisions and taking responsibility.

16 posted on 08/30/2010 6:40:49 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I should be, but I'm not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick
and I am sure that all of your clients have greatly appreciated the fact that you chose to be a "Tax-chick"!
18 posted on 08/30/2010 6:43:24 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson