Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexico Imposes New Tariffs on U.S. After NAFTA Violation
Texas Farm Bureau ^ | Sep 3, 2010 | Amanda Hill

Posted on 08/28/2010 1:24:26 PM PDT by fightinJAG

A trucking dispute between Mexico and the U.S. has led Mexico to expand a list of tariffs to 54 American agriculture products worth an estimated $1.7 billion.

The tariffs on American exports come after Congress discontinued the U.S.-Mexico Cross-Border Trucking Demonstration Project, a pilot program which allowed up to 100 firms from both countries to transport international cargo across the border without restriction.

In evaluations of the fiscal year 2009 budget, Congress determined there was not adequate funding for the Department of Transportation (DOT) to continue the Demonstration Project. Under current U.S. law, Mexican transportation vehicles only may enter the country up to 25 miles from the border.

Under NAFTA, participating countries must allow free transportation and circulation of goods across North American borders. When a country does not comply with NAFTA requirements, the reciprocating country may file a case to correct the infraction.

"Mexico filed a NAFTA petition, which was granted in their favor, because the U.S. is not fulfilling their obligations," said Dr. Parr Rosson, professor and extension economist with the Texas AgriLife Extension Service at Texas A&M University.

(Excerpt) Read more at txfb.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: border; mexico; nafta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 08/28/2010 1:24:31 PM PDT by fightinJAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama

In before the “let the trade war begin” geniuses.


2 posted on 08/28/2010 1:27:52 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

...”countries must allow free transportation and circulation of goods across North American borders.”

Gee, I would think we EASILY allow a ‘circulation of goods’ across our borders from Mexico.


3 posted on 08/28/2010 1:30:53 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

We’ve got bigger issues with mexico than their tantrums.


4 posted on 08/28/2010 1:32:20 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

How can they place tariffs on our goods? We don’t sell them anything. They don’t have any money to buy our stuff. If it weren’t for NAFTA, the housing crash never would have happened. Let the trade war begin. We need to stop our free trade with China. We don’t manufacture anything in America anymore. If only the WTO was elected, they wouldn’t vote against us 100% of the time.


5 posted on 08/28/2010 1:34:26 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

How many car manufacturers are now south of the border? I say have obama pull them out now. He does own them, doesn’t he?


6 posted on 08/28/2010 1:36:17 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Under NAFTA, participating countries must allow free transportation and circulation of goods across North American borders.

Is this true? It couldn't apply to things like medicines, but what about other consumer products? Hmmm.

7 posted on 08/28/2010 1:38:16 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Ronald Reagan's Fault©.
8 posted on 08/28/2010 1:39:31 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
If it weren’t for NAFTA, the housing crash never would have happened.

Barney Frank and Chris Dodd wrote NAFTA? /s

9 posted on 08/28/2010 1:39:57 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

Fine I will pay more for tomatoes and other fruit ...to protect our roads from Mexican truckers


10 posted on 08/28/2010 1:41:10 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

AMEN !!!!


11 posted on 08/28/2010 1:42:10 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
Hey, good to see you. What's the latest on the U.S./Canada softwood lumber dispute? It's completely fallen off the radar in the U.S.

As an aside, I've been doing my part to cut the U.S. trade deficit with Canada. Foster's is now brewed in Georgia and Texas instead of being brewed by Carling Breweries.

12 posted on 08/28/2010 1:44:48 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

Your desire to see more money lifted out of my pocketbook (not to mention your disregard for U.S. agricultural producers) is most noble. Some might even call it “conservative.”


13 posted on 08/28/2010 1:47:14 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

If it weren’t for NAFTA, the housing crash never would have happened.


How so?


14 posted on 08/28/2010 1:47:14 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 ("If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait till it is free"--PJ O'rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bushwon

Sorry, just repeating a stupid claim I heard on FR, in order to mock it.


15 posted on 08/28/2010 1:50:31 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

Can we retaliate by slapping a hefty tariff on Mexican exports like illegal alines?


16 posted on 08/28/2010 1:52:29 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

Come on man,
how am I gonna get my much needed marijuana without the mexican trucks able to come freely across the border?


17 posted on 08/28/2010 1:56:55 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

You think that would stop them from coming over? If you do, you think like some of our FR protectionists.


18 posted on 08/28/2010 2:09:00 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

No worries. The trucks simply will continue to come over and get offloaded onto Teamster trucks. Think of all the high-paying jobs you’ll be supporting, and the campaign contributions (to the Democrats).


19 posted on 08/28/2010 2:10:56 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Joke, rudeboy its a joke.
But you b right in that the doper loby is firmly behind the dems.
“offloaded onto Teamster trucks”?
I can’t believe something like that would happen now though.
And I wear size 14 shoe and am tall dark and handsome too. Yeah right.


20 posted on 08/28/2010 2:20:05 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson