Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abathar

Additional link:

http://www.physorg.com/news192426996.html

I’d like to point out the opposite use of this device, and one that may be just as valuable.

That is, as created, it turns airflow into mechanical energy. Why not use it to turn mechanical energy into airflow?

A conventional, and popular, device that does this right now is the centrifugal fan, as is used in swamp coolers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_fan

But there may also be a future for centrifugal fans in a new class of aircraft, called the FanWing, which is alleged to be more efficient than a helicopter, with greater lift, quieter, and mechanically simpler.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanwing

http://www.fanwing.com/

Now here’s the big question: How does the flow rate of a *reversed* bladeless wind turbine compare to that of a bladed centrifugal fan?

If it is as good as, or better than a centrifugal fan, it could very well end up producing powered flight in an aircraft.


15 posted on 07/31/2010 9:25:34 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Bookmark


16 posted on 07/31/2010 9:29:36 AM PDT by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Do you have any idea what that would weigh on a plane?


34 posted on 07/31/2010 10:35:20 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson