Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Critz May Have Personally Engaged in Voter Intimidation
The Johnstown Tribune-Democrat ^ | May 18, 2010 | Mike Faher

Posted on 05/18/2010 8:57:29 PM PDT by MurthasFatHead

JOHNSTOWN — Republicans today accused Democrat congressional candidate Mark Critz of “illegally campaigning” inside Cambria County polling places.

The Pennsylvania Republican Party and the campaign of Tim Burns, Critz’s GOP opponent in the 12th Congressional District, said Critz was witnessed inside polls in Westmont.

Critz’s campaign did not deny that he had been inside some polls but maintained that nothing improper or illegal occurred.

“Mark did no electioneering within polling locations,” Critz spokeswoman Holly Shulman said. “These are nothing more than desperate attacks which we’ve seen from Tim Burns throughout this campaign.”

The Burns campaign circulated a photo purportedly showing Critz inside a polling place in Westmont.

And the state GOP committee quoted a section of the Pennsylvania Election Code saying “no person, when within the polling place, shall electioneer or solicit votes for any political party, political body or candidate.”

“Get out of the polls, Mark!” Republican Party spokesman Mike Barley said in a statement issued to reporters. “Your presence breaks the law, intimidates voters and election workers and could influence the outcome of this election.”

The Burns campaign questioned whether Critz had a “poll watcher certificate” that would have allowed him inside the voting place. Critz’s campaign did not say whether the candidate had such a certificate.

Sally Winder, judge of elections in the Westmont No. 5 precinct, said Critz entered the polling place, shook the hands of a few poll workers, and was told he had to leave. He complied, she said.

Fred R. Smith, Cambria County election supervisor, said Critz should have been asked to leave the precinct.

Although Smith reported receiving one phone call from a man who was "out of control" over Critz allegedly being in a Westmont precinct, he had not received any complaints that Critz improperly campaigned inside the precinct or interfered with anyone who was voting or waiting to vote.

A person could lodge a formal complaint with the county board of elections. Smith said he was unsure what, if anything, would be done about such a complaint.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: critz; fraud; intimidation; voter
I have lived, on and off, in Johnstown for the past 47 years and can confidently say that these people are idiots. They would elect Kim Jong-Il if he had a "D" after his name. They are 35 years behind the curve and deserve all the crap that a Republican Congress will give them after this fall's election. But Democrats are notoriously corrupt here, so I have to seriously question the validity of Critz's election. Critz himself may have engaged in voter fraud! Who knows what else has been going on behind the scenes? And the local media are simply cheerleaders for the Democrats--The Tribune-Democrat is nothing more than a party organ, and the major local TV station, WJAC, makes Radio Havana look reputable. They will not continue investigating this story. Johnstown deserves to swept into the dustbin of history.
1 posted on 05/18/2010 8:57:29 PM PDT by MurthasFatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MurthasFatHead

Handing out pork chops and bacon sandwiches at the polls was a good idea.


2 posted on 05/18/2010 9:01:19 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Politics is only about money and the power to control it. ALL of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurthasFatHead

This type of district has more residents on the gravy train than employed.


3 posted on 05/18/2010 9:11:27 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurthasFatHead

Look at the Armstrong County numbers. There is clearly something wrong. If I were auditing it I’d have to say it looks like someone altered numbers except they didn’t bother to be consistent about it because the primary numbers reflect what was suspected but the special election numbers suggest a sizable number of Republicans crossed over and voted for Crtiz. Republican Turnout was significantly higher in this county than Democrat turnout as normal yet Critz pulled out a victory? McCain Won this county, Russell won this county, even Murtha in 2006 never amassed the percentage win that Critz did in this county against Diana Irey and if tonight had been the general election for Senate the Republican would have easily won.

It may be explainable because of the Russell Burns conflict but it just looks strange.


4 posted on 05/18/2010 9:11:29 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Tyranny thrives when the people are silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurthasFatHead

Similar things will be said in Massachusetts, after all D’s win their Congressional Seats, at the conclusion of the November 2 election. I want to be wrong about this, but I don’t believe that I’m wrong about this prediction. I, also, believed that the D’s would retain the Pennsylvania 12 Congressional Seat, just from the 2 to 1 ratio that the D’s continue to hold in this area.


5 posted on 05/18/2010 9:14:17 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurthasFatHead

Critz’ response: “Hey, it worked for obama, so I figured it was legal!”


6 posted on 05/18/2010 9:24:15 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The frog who rides on a scorpion should not be surprised when he last hears "it is my nature.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurthasFatHead

WEll, of course. He’s a Democrat. Next question.


7 posted on 05/18/2010 9:29:17 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Sing it/


8 posted on 05/18/2010 9:31:26 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
Look at the Armstrong County numbers. There is clearly something wrong. If I were auditing it I’d have to say it looks like someone altered numbers except they didn’t bother to be consistent about it because the primary numbers reflect what was suspected but the special election numbers suggest a sizable number of Republicans crossed over and voted for Crtiz. Republican Turnout was significantly higher in this county than Democrat turnout as normal yet Critz pulled out a victory? McCain Won this county, Russell won this county, even Murtha in 2006 never amassed the percentage win that Critz did in this county against Diana Irey and if tonight had been the general election for Senate the Republican would have easily won.
It may be explainable because of the Russell Burns conflict but it just looks strange.

I believe that this is the most important post of the day and it needs to be put up as a vanity.

I thought about this for a few hours and this is an operation chaos move that went wrong. Folks wanting Burns to lose the Special Election and Russell to win the primary and run against Critz. So, they voted for Russell and Critz.

Now in the cold like of day.. this tactic sucked but at the time it may very well have seemed smart.

9 posted on 05/19/2010 11:29:45 AM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson