Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lucysmom
Polarik is not credible. His analysis is flawed.

OK, if so, I would welcome more insight on his analysis...

114 posted on 05/08/2010 9:39:02 AM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: SteveH
Caution!

I wouldn't waste my time!!

You are dealing with a known SP aka FINO!!!

152 posted on 05/08/2010 11:34:53 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: lucysmom
Polarik is not credible. His analysis is flawed.

OK, if so, I would welcome more insight on his analysis...

Chirp... chirp...

Since I have not seen a response from you as to why you claim Polarik's analysis is flawed, then by your lack of response, you give the appearance that you are even less credible than you claim Polarik is.

In any case, thanks for the clarification.

160 posted on 05/08/2010 12:24:08 PM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson