Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lucysmom
Polarik is not credible. His analysis is flawed.

In your expert opinion, what is wrong with it?

113 posted on 05/08/2010 9:38:17 AM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: usmcobra
In your expert opinion, what is wrong with it?

It undermines her conclusion and, therefore, must be wrong.
116 posted on 05/08/2010 9:40:33 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: usmcobra
In your expert opinion, what is wrong with it?

Here is an analysis by someone who does have verifiable credentials.

http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/235-Bad-Science-How-Not-To-Do-Image-Analysis-Part-II.html

I do, BTW, have enough professional experience with PhotoShop to qualify as an expert.

137 posted on 05/08/2010 10:23:06 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson