Posted on 05/06/2010 12:29:51 PM PDT by FightforFreedomCA
What does she believe that you oppose?
That’s fine, me too.. babs needs to hit the pasture
It would be nice for the party to not give one up out here and really take advantage of the sentiment in the base out here and all those who also see that and act on it if Chuck gets the primary nod. She ain’t getting coronated like aRnie,. we see how that worked out. 8)
Awwwwwwwwww, did she lose you as a supporter..I bet she’s crushed
I dont know where you are from, but you have to remember not everyone thinks like you do...Californians are not strict Conservatives, never have been. Government Officials elected by their constituents must represent the body of the electorate....They must represent and vote as the people who voted them in think. This is all part of our Republic landscape. I wish everyone thought as we strict conservatives did, but they do not. So with that...i would rather see a person like Carly Fiorina, rather than a Boxer or Pelosi or Reed.....they simply cannot win. We can work with Forina...you know you cannot work with a Boxer, Pelosi or Reed.....That is the simple truth.
Seems right in line for Palin. Just like she endorsed McCain.
When are people going to figure it out about her?
There’s a reason McCain picked her.
She’s not all that many would like to think she is.
Just remember all of those disillusioned 0bama voters who refused to see him for what he really is.
Yes, of course it did, but I am equally surprised at this endorsement. I know the argument -- I get it, but if Chuck would have received Sarah's endorsement, that might have given him the national attention and boost he needed to pull in the Rubio, Brown type of support. I wish she would have endorsed based on conservative principles and not perceived vote outcome. She could have made the difference with her endorsement and possibly started a rally for Chuck.
And again I ask you: Who is your “conservative” candidate for the presidency that has a snow ball’s chance in Hell of beating Obama and the Chicago/DC machine?!
I will support the Lady whatever her decision.
Boo.
I vote for trying to move each area more to the red. But, I believe that trying to make too drastic of moves will only fail.
It’s not like I’m a big fan of Fiorina, but its freakin CALIFORNIA for goodness sake..whoever has the nomination on the GOP side I will vote for..don’t care who it is..I just hope it’s not Meg Whitman but you know what, if she has a good chance of beating Boxer, I’ll hold my nose and vote for her, if Fiorina is the nominee, then she has my vote. This state is so messed up, some just don’t get it. We are trying to get rid of Boxer here, and for the ones that are upset with Sarah’s endorsement of Fiorina, GET OVER IT. I bet half the ones who are upset don’t even live in CA or dont like her to begin with
Gender selection, perhaps?
So if you're gonna 'awwwwwwww' like that, open the mouth good and wide.
We are two freaking years out give it time my friend! The one thing I know right now is that I won’t back an inarticulate, rino like Palin. That would be a big gift to Obama and would assure his reelection.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.