Worst of all, the attempt by church spokesmen to dismiss the issue as “gossip” shows that nothing has changed. The people running the church appear to be just another corrupt arrogant elite.
Stalin and his successors wanted a method to topple the Roman Catholic Church so they hit upon the scheme of infiltration. Not by homosexuals at first, but by agents of the USSR. Those agents were to embed themselves in the Church, then worm their way into the decision-making jobs that would allow them to knowingly recruit homosexuals: send them to the seminaries and release them into the parishes to do their dirty work with most not knowing why there were being given this 'opportunity'.
The scheme began to work very well subsequent to Vatican II where anything was considered appropriate. It made it much easier to latch on to innocent children, use them then seek cover behind the cassocks of the corrupt bishops.
Changing the church back to the days of pre-Vatican II was the answer, and unfortunately the successors of Pope Pius XII knew that, vacillated, then continued down the road towards the damaging or destruction of the Church.
Each of these popes owe our Maker an explanation. That explanation will be difficult indeed!
Thank you, Mr Dershowitz.
I would love for the church to explain these “traditions” to me if it were my child that was abused. I would then explain one of my “traditions”: cutting off body parts of those who harm my children.
Good words from Dershowitz. He can be a raving leftist flake at times, but just when I start to mentally dismiss him, then he stuns me with a really good article showing genuine respect for the law and the Constitution.
This tradition was of great comfort to the early reformers of the 15th through 17th centuries such as Jan Hus and William Tyndale and to an extent Martin Luther and his friends.
“at least five important traditions that make it difficult to move quickly and aggressively in response to complaints of abuse.”
Then how did the number of abuse cases decrease so sharply in the late 70’s early 80’s?
Freegards
{{Sigh}}
So many feel free to weigh in with an opinion despite a lack of knowledge.
Once you are a priest, you are a priest for life. The vow is permanent. You can choose to break your vow and stop performing priestly duties, or the Church can forbid you from performing priestly duties and representing the Church. Either way, you are still a priest. This is why it is a long, long process to “defrock” a priest; it’s passing a judgement on a covenant between a priest and God.
Secondly, the era of these abuses was a time when the psychiatrists were telling everyone that pedophiles could be cured. Church leadership thought these priests could be salvaged. Only 20 years of experience has taught us that pedophiles cannot be cured.
Thirdly, there is an element of militant homosexuality in the priesthood. Most were ordained in the 50’s and 60’s. Thankfully, they are retiring and will not be around much longer to protect their fellow deviants.
This is a great time of cleansing for the Church. We Catholics will be better off once we are tempered by fire.
Thanks.