Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

Meatloaf and potatoes in the oven...pant pant pant..ok..I always understood why anyone would be upset with Stupak or any congresscritter for voting for healthcare...valid reason..but for wanting an order saying the taxpayer would not fund ELECTIVE abortions...I agree with that..why would anyone be so angry because he does not want the taxpayer to pay for elective abortions? I understand some are saying this does not assure us of that. I disagree and I believe Stupak believes he got that reassurance. I am going to give him that. k?? did I leave anything out? And I do not quibble..ask the old blue dawg......


117 posted on 03/22/2010 3:59:45 PM PDT by DallasSun (i believe in separation of church and hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: DallasSun
So you support the polite lie that allowed this to pass, and apparently rest assured that the “reassurance” he got was sufficient that this measure will not provide taxpayer money to fund abortions.

Stupak was a dupe. Either a willing dupe, or an unwilling and unwitting dupe.

Either way he was duped.

Either he is a fool, or a liar.

This bill does and will provide funds for abortions.

That, you may begin to understand, is why people are upset with Stupak, and those are the “right” reasons, and perfectly credible.

118 posted on 03/22/2010 4:13:05 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson