I never said that anyone’s anger was not credible. But let it be for the right reasons.
If you don't understand it, then it must, to you at least, not be for credible reasons.
Are you now beginning to understand why people are upset with him?
Do you find their reasons for being upset with him credible, or are there credible reasons still not “the right reasons”?
What are “the right reasons” for them to be mad at Stupak?