Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powerful Catholic Quietly Shaping Abortion, Health Bill Debate (USCCB's Richard Doerflinger)
NPR ^ | March 10, 2010 | Laura Parker

Posted on 03/11/2010 2:48:35 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o

Richard Doerflinger doesn't look the part of a high-powered political strategist. Bearded and bespectacled, he works in a small, cluttered office out of one of Washington’s less fashionable neighborhoods, far from the lobbying bastions of K Street.

Yet as the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' point man on abortion, Doerflinger has emerged as a major player in the health care debate, one likely to play a pivotal role in the outcome.

It was Doerflinger who orchestrated the bishops’ successful campaign late last year to add a tough anti-abortion provision to the House legislation. The Senate adopted less stringent language.

Now, as President Barack Obama begins his last-ditch effort to pass final legislation, Doerflinger and his bosses are sending a clear message: If the Democrats want to succeed, they must include the House provision, or something equally restrictive, on abortion.

“The Senate may have to figure out whether it wants its abortion position or if it wants a health care bill," Doerflinger said in a recent interview. "That’s the difficult decision (House Speaker) Nancy Pelosi made, and she chose a health care bill. The Senate decided it could have its cake and eat it, too. That is no longer true. Something’s going to have to give.”

The bishops have supported universal health care coverage since the days of Woodrow Wilson. But that won't stop them from opposing any bill lacking a strict ban on using federal funds to pay for abortions, Doerflinger warns.

“We have a simple position,” he adds. “Everybody gets covered. Nobody gets deliberately killed.”

The bishops’ stand has encouraged abortion foes, outraged many women's groups and dismayed supporters - including some liberal Catholics - of the Democrats' health care legislation. They're worried an abortion impasse could derail the best chance in a generation to enact sweeping health legislation.

“We can’t lose sight of what’s at stake here,” says Chris Korzen, a former labor leader who heads Catholics United, founded to counter conservative Catholic groups. “We’re talking about extending health care coverage to millions of Americans who don’t have it. That’s highly consistent with pro-life values.”

Abortion rights groups have criticized Doerflinger and the bishops, saying they are holding the health care legislation hostage to their agenda. “No one else drew a line in the sand,” says Laurie Rubiner, vice president for public policy for Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Working in "Little Rome"

The bishops' conference is headquartered in a neighborhood known as "Little Rome." Nearby is Catholic University and the largest Catholic church in the U.S., which has 65 million Catholics.

As associate director of the conference's Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, Doerflinger cranks out reams of position papers, e-mails to congressional aides and letters from the bishops to lawmakers - not only on abortion, but also on euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research and physician-assisted suicide.

A self-described "policy wonk," Doerflinger leaves a lot of the schmoozing on Capitol Hill to colleagues, but doesn't miss crucial meetings, including one in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office the night before the House passed the health bill last year. He and John Carr, who also works for the bishops, were the lone outsiders, prompting criticism from abortion-rights supporters that Pelosi, who is Catholic and supports abortion rights, was taking her cues from Rome.

The two men helped craft the final wording of the anti-abortion amendment offered by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., that cleared the way for House passage of the health care bill by five votes.

"He's a real smart guy," says Stupak, referring to Doerflinger. "Pretty detailed guy who does his homework ."

Among friends and foes, Doerflinger is known for his in-depth knowledge. Last year, he was honored as one of six of the “greatest heroes” of the anti-abortion movement and awarded a $100,000 prize by the Massachusetts-based Gerard Health Foundation, which opposes abortion.

Critics say that Doerflinger can be bombastic and unyielding. “He doesn’t subscribe to the theory that you can catch more flies with honey than you can with vinegar,” says Sean Tipton, director of public affairs for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

In the late 1990s, Tipton recalls, then-Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, a Republican, held a meeting to try work out a compromise on the contentious issue of federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. "It became apparent that Doerflinger and I could not do that,” Tipton says. “When you’re coming at the issue where a fertilized egg is a sacred human being with full constitutional rights, there’s not a lot of room for compromise."

Doerflinger admits he's blunt, but adds, "I don’t see a point in avoiding plain facts.”

Wrenching Tragedy

A wrenching family tragedy helped propel Doerflinger toward his life’s work. When he was a teenager growing up on Long Island, his older brother, Eugene, was injured in a car accident and lapsed into a "vegetative state,” Doerflinger says. One physician advised his mother to put Eugene in an institution and "forget you ever had a son,” he says. Instead, she took Eugene home. Four months later, he woke up. Eugene lived near his family, although with severe mental and physical disabilities, until his death in 2008.

The experience of how a family can come together and care for a loved one who had a life that other people think is over affected my attitudes,” Doerflinger says.

Culture Wars

He has spent 30 years on the front lines of the culture wars, with the ultimate goal of overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion. He sees the battle being won through incremental change.

But critics say it would be a colossal mistake to kill universal health care for an incremental victory on abortion. “The difference between the two bills is pretty thin,” says Michael Sean Winters, a liberal Catholic author. “Doerflinger is so dug in, he’s missing the point on the Senate bill, which is also pro-life."

The House health bill bars insurance companies from selling policies that cover abortion to anyone who receives federal subsidies to buy insurance. The Senate’s less restrictive amendment permits insurers to offer abortion coverage, but requires customers to buy it with a separate check drawn on personal funds.

The Democrats’ best shot at succeeding on health care is to have the House pass the Senate bill. Then both chambers would make some changes in that legislation by passing a second bill under complex budget rules.

But some anti-abortion House lawmakers say they won't vote for the Senate bill. And it could be difficult for the Senate to adopt the House abortion language because of political and procedural reasons.

Amid the wrangling, Doerflinger stays focused on what he says is the bottom line. “If the bill attacks life itself, in our view, it’s not health care reform,” he says. “You’ve undermined the foundation of the right to health care if you’re weakening the right to life. We can’t get over that. We can’t walk away and say this is good enough. That’s our moral position. We don’t trade the two off."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bishop; catholic; healthcare; usccb
Article referenced in this Free Republic thread:

"Powerful Jew Quietly Shaping...".

A good topic for a panel discussion...

1 posted on 03/11/2010 2:48:35 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pope Pius XII; sinsofsolarempirefan; jnsun; ExTexasRedhead; Yehuda; Uncle Miltie; don-o; ...

Class, discuss nicely.


2 posted on 03/11/2010 2:52:46 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Point of clarification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

This isn’t a question just of abortion. It also a question of removing benefits promised to seniors. There are milions of people, retired on SS, who have counted on Medicare to care for them in their old age. Some are wealthy and can afford the best Medicare gap insurance. Most are NOT wealthy and are eking by on SS and have taken Medicare advantage insurance. They’ve already increased payments for the Medicare Advantage coverage 40 fold until most seniors cannot afford it. What will happen to them? The lucky ones will die before they lose their homes, that’s what. This so-called “healthcare” Bill affects those both at the beginning and at the end of life.

It seems that only government employees emerge unscathed.


3 posted on 03/11/2010 2:56:21 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Oh, you're right. It adds up to a major attack on people on both ends of the lifecycle (prenatal and geriatric, or you could say from zygotes to old-goats)--- and there's plenty more, too. Plus the huge, unstable, 9.99-on-the-Richter-scale question of whether a power-and-money-ravenous federal bureaucracy is the way to solve cost and coverage problems.

I personally think it's the worst possible way.

It's like getting a bushel basket full of credit cards in your children's and grandchildren's names, and your neighbor's children's and grandchildren's names, and maxing them all out because you want to "help people."

4 posted on 03/11/2010 3:10:44 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (The TV ad says 8 out of 10 people suffer from hemorrhoids. So... the other 2 people enjoy them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
“We’re talking about extending health care coverage to millions of Americans who don’t have it. That’s highly consistent with pro-life values.”

Right.All except for the part about killing the unborn.

5 posted on 03/11/2010 3:44:23 PM PST by don-o (My son, Ben - Marine Lance Corporal texted me at 0330 on 2/3/10: AMERICA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Defeat Obamacare call list: List now contains the new MAYBES culled from FR posts.
PLEASE CALL! DC OFFICE LOCAL OFFICE State District

Code Red” - House Target List on Health Care

The National Republican Congressional Committee has published a target list on health care. In addition to continuing to contact the five Tennessee Democrat Congressmen, you can go http://www.votervoice.net/link/clickthrough/ext/94697.aspx to contact some of these targets. Much of the talk following Obama’s announcement has focused on how to defeat this second bill through reconciliation, but that is misleading because the first step to defeating Obamacare is not by concentrating on defeating the “fixer” bill but by defeating the Senate bill in the House when it goes to the floor for an up-or-down vote on Thursday, March 18th.

Rep. Lincoln Davis 202-225-6831 Columbia office: 931-490-8699
Rep. Jim Cooper 202-225-4311 Nashville office: 615-736-5295
Rep. Bart Gordon 202-225-4231 Murfreesboro office: 615-896-1986
John Tanner (202) 225-4714, Union City, (731) 885-7070, Jackson Phone: (731) 423-4848, Millington (901) 873-5690 TN (MAYBE)
Rep. Steve Cohen 202-225-3265 Memphis office: 901-544-4131
Harry Mitchell (202) 225-2190 (480) 946-2411 AZ 5th District
Gabrielle Giffords (202) 225-2542 (520) 881-3588 AZ 8th District
Ann Kirkpatrick (202) 225-2315 (928) 226-6914 AZ 1st District
Jerry McNerney (202) 225-1947 925-833-0643 CA 11th District
John Salazar 202-225-4761 970-245-7107 CO 3rd District
Jim Himes (202) 225-5541 (866) 453-0028 CT 4th District
Alan Grayson (202) 225-2176 (407) 841-1757 FL 8th District
Bill Foster (202) 225-2976 630-406-1114 IL 14th District
Baron Hill 202 225 5315 812 288 3999 IN 9th District
Mark Schauer (202) 225-6276 (517) 780-9075 MI 7th District
Gary Peters (202) 225-5802 (248) 273-4227 MI 9th District
Dina Titus (202) 225-3252 702-256-DINA (3462) NV 3rd District
Carol Shea-Porter (202) 225-5456 (603) 743-4813 NH 1st District
Tim Bishop (202) 225-3826 (631) 696-6500 NY 1st District
John Hall (202) 225-5441 (845) 225-3641 x49371 NY 19th District
Bill Owens (202) 225-4611 (315) 782-3150 NY 23rd District
Mike Arcuri (202)225-3665 (315)793-8146 NY 24th District
Dan Maffei (202) 225-3701 (315) 423-5657 NY 25th District
Earl Pomeroy (202) 225-2611 (701) 224-0355 ND At-Large District
Steven Driehaus (202) 225-2216 (513) 684-2723 OH 1st District
Mary Jo Kilroy (202) 225-2015 (614) 294-2196 OH 15th District
Zach Space (202) 225-6265 (330) 364-4300 OH 18th District
Kathy Dahlkemper (202) 225-5406 (814) 456-2038 PA 3rd District
Patrick Murphy (202) 225-4276 (215) 826-1963 PA 8th District
Christopher Carney (202) 225-3731 (570) 585-9988 PA 10th District
Paul Kanjorski (202) 225-6511 (570) 825-2200 PA 11th District
John Spratt (202) 225-5501 (803)327-1114 SC 5th District
Tom Perriello (202) 225-4711 (276) 656-2291 VA 5th District
Alan Mollohan (202) 225-4172 (304) 623-4422 WVA 1st District
Nick Rahall (202) 225-3452 (304) 252-5000 WVA 3rd District
Steve Kagen (202) 225-5665 (920) 437-1954 WI 8th District

Bart Stupak (202) 225 4735 MI (MAYBE)
Brian Baird (202) 225-3536, Vancouver, (360) 695-6292. Olympia, (360) 352-9768, (MAYBE)
senator mark begich (202) 224-3004 toll free. (877) 501 - 6275 just became a MAYBE
Jason Altmire 202-225-2565, Aliquippa, 724-378-0928,
Natrona Heights, 724-226-1304 (MAYBE)

On the Bubble (Major developments from the “yes” and “no” columns in the House)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2467046/posts


6 posted on 03/11/2010 4:42:50 PM PST by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I’m disgusted with the USCCB. He’s right. Since Woodrow Wilson the Church in America has been on a socialist mission. Jesus told the apostles to heal the sick, he did not tell them that health care was to be turned over to Ceasar. The Church has abdicated the role appointed it by Jesus Christ and our Church will pay dearly for this travesty. The Church has now become complaisant in this holocaust against the unborn whether intentionally or not. If there were any other Church on earth that I could turn to for the sacraments, I’d leave, but I will stay and continue to fight this travesty.


7 posted on 03/11/2010 4:46:08 PM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson