Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
I don't know but I think the NRA is over-reacting to this proposal. Here's a link to the proposed regulation. VT
16 posted on 01/29/2010 7:33:05 AM PST by JimVT (Oh, the days of the Kerry dancing, Oh, the ring of the piper's tune)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JimVT
I don't know but I think the NRA is over-reacting to this proposal. Here's a link to the proposed regulation. VT

Thanks for the link. I read almost 4 pages of the 18 pdf pages. They were talking about "chemical" defined as they pleased. I searched for lead, but I couldn't find it, although lead is a ubiquitous element. Elemental lead is one of the least reactive elements found in nature. These clowns know just enough science and toxicology as to be worse than useless. They just cause needless trouble.

23 posted on 01/29/2010 8:02:40 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: JimVT

I scanned through it and I didn’t see lead or ammunition specifically mentioned, but ammunition isn’t among the product categories exempted either.

Maybe something to keep an eye on, but your right, it’s not in itself an ammo ban. I can foresee An extremely anti-gun bureaucrat may use it to try to restrict lead bullets though.


45 posted on 01/29/2010 6:17:42 PM PST by kamikaze2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson