Posted on 01/19/2010 8:55:56 AM PST by Blue Turtle
Edited on 01/19/2010 9:05:03 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
"We have a serious constitutional problem."
Now linked to a Breitbart video of Frank, “God didn’t create the filibuster.”
http://www.breitbart.tv/barney-frank-god-didnt-create-the-filibuster/
Why is the source listed as Drudge report, but the link goes to Breitbart?
Some detail would be appreciated.
Hey Barney, here’s a tip for you~~don’t renew your lease on your DC apartment.
There’s a vid —Frank on Air America. Yuk, I won’t listen...
Barney: you are a Rep, not a Senator. Stay out of their business.
Much like the U.S. Constitution the Senate rules are to be bent and shaped at the whim of the ‘Rats.
“God didn’t create the filibuster.”
God didn’t create a lot of things, Barney.
Uhm, is Barney somehow seeing himself as the third senator from Massachusetts?
Drudge did his thing of posting the headline before linking it to the Breitbart video. So evidently the Moderator changed the link and the thread title after Drudge’s source was made known.
For instance: a man to lay with another man.
Dear Barney,
YOU’RE NEXT!!!
Ironically, much to the dislike of many conservatives the gang of 14 (including McCain) blocking changing the Senate rules for judges most likely saved us from a health reform bill in June last year. Levin was wrong on this. If that rule was changed for Bush judges the 7 democrats would have likely changed the rules for health reform last year.
Bawney didn’t have a pwoblem when it held up appointment of fedewal judges when Bush 43 was in office.
Hey Bwaney......He did’t create you to take it in the pooper, either....but there ya’ go.
Where will all the gay hookers go?
(2005:) Frank explained he still supports an ``across-the-board’’ ban against all filibusters, but he opposes the Republican ``nuclear option’’ because it only outlaws filibusters against judicial nominees. ``I object to (a filibuster ban) being used in a very specific instance,’’ Frank said.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1408126/posts
He objected to a filibuster ban when the “very specific instance” was Bush trying to get a judge confirmed. But now, nuance fans, he approves of a filibuster ban because the “specific instance” is not quite as much to his liking.
Hey Barney - you are correct about God and the Senate Rules, but I would tread lightly when invoking God’s name, remember He is known for smoting a few souls now and again. One other thing Barney, please stay front and center in your strong support of nancy and bammy, it reminds me and America what “nancy boys” look like.
As inane as Frank’s point is, I’m not even sure the tard’s statement true. The Good Lord saw fit to use pointless talking as a means of putting the brakes on the Tower of Babel project, after all. Do these a$$clowns think for even a second before spewing verbal diarrhea?
God also didn’t create Adam and Steve.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.